'Jewish Australian'? I don't think I've heard that one before. It seems to mean that you live in a tiny, self-justifying bubble, which thinks the genocide is OK but Grace Tame is not. Verily, the mind boggles. How twisted must a mind be to think Tame is not a good choice to host a program about autism in women?
Although I see nothing wrong with him or anyone "criticising the broadcaster" or giving an interview to fellow zionist Avi Yemeni, his portrayal of protestor's use of the phrase "globalise the intifada" is exactly what we'd expect from a zionist. Twist, Deflect, Disparage and Accuse is part of their MO (along with Kill, Displace and Terrorise). I agree with the others here, SACK PICKERING. Did he condemn israel when they tried their little regime change in Iran recently, effectively promoting intifada, a violent one at that with the use of mossad agents?
So what you are saying is that Charlie Pickering violated ABC policies by using his position as an ABC presenter, standing outside of the ABC in an interview. In his choice of placement he deliberately highlighted his credentials and relationship with the ABC. In so doing the interview implied that this was endorsed by the ABC. As such his actions violated policies :
Policy 4 Impartiality and diversity of perspectives. - using his "Jewish lens" to interpret a person's words and actions. In so doing failing to respect the lens and perspective of people who are of a different religion or political persuasion. Could a different interviewer say "As a Catholic Australian", I oppose interviews and voices given to pro-abortion activists?
Policy 6 Privacy. - His dealings with an organisation known not to respect privacy and safety of individuals. It would be difficult for Pickering to argue he did not know of what had happened to his colleague Faruqi in 2018.
Not according to the ABC's subsequent statement. There is no violation of these policies in instances of anti-genocide bashing. Personal opinions are apparently OK for Zionists.
No but yes. No because if you read the policy, he clearly contravenes it. But because he's spouting Zionist talking points, he's only expressing a personal view, which by some twisted internal ABC logic known only to management and the board, doesn't contravene the policy.
'Jewish Australian'? I don't think I've heard that one before. It seems to mean that you live in a tiny, self-justifying bubble, which thinks the genocide is OK but Grace Tame is not. Verily, the mind boggles. How twisted must a mind be to think Tame is not a good choice to host a program about autism in women?
sack picker/ing.the hypocrisy of the abc to allow him to keep attacking with biased and misguided rhetoric of discrimination and hate.
is it because he is a "mere male"? is it because he is "expressing his freedom of speech"as a zionist.SACK PICKERING!!!!
Sorry no. The ABC has issued a statement saying it's all OK because they were his personal opinions, so no action will be taken.
I kid you not. They actually said that.
Although I see nothing wrong with him or anyone "criticising the broadcaster" or giving an interview to fellow zionist Avi Yemeni, his portrayal of protestor's use of the phrase "globalise the intifada" is exactly what we'd expect from a zionist. Twist, Deflect, Disparage and Accuse is part of their MO (along with Kill, Displace and Terrorise). I agree with the others here, SACK PICKERING. Did he condemn israel when they tried their little regime change in Iran recently, effectively promoting intifada, a violent one at that with the use of mossad agents?
So what you are saying is that Charlie Pickering violated ABC policies by using his position as an ABC presenter, standing outside of the ABC in an interview. In his choice of placement he deliberately highlighted his credentials and relationship with the ABC. In so doing the interview implied that this was endorsed by the ABC. As such his actions violated policies :
Policy 4 Impartiality and diversity of perspectives. - using his "Jewish lens" to interpret a person's words and actions. In so doing failing to respect the lens and perspective of people who are of a different religion or political persuasion. Could a different interviewer say "As a Catholic Australian", I oppose interviews and voices given to pro-abortion activists?
Policy 6 Privacy. - His dealings with an organisation known not to respect privacy and safety of individuals. It would be difficult for Pickering to argue he did not know of what had happened to his colleague Faruqi in 2018.
Not according to the ABC's subsequent statement. There is no violation of these policies in instances of anti-genocide bashing. Personal opinions are apparently OK for Zionists.
Could it be that some people are above the rules. Fortunately, our world has people like Grace Tame who have the tenacity to push for change.
Are Pickering's remarks in line with the ABC public comment policy I wonder?
No but yes. No because if you read the policy, he clearly contravenes it. But because he's spouting Zionist talking points, he's only expressing a personal view, which by some twisted internal ABC logic known only to management and the board, doesn't contravene the policy.