'Jewish Australian'? I don't think I've heard that one before. It seems to mean that you live in a tiny, self-justifying bubble, which thinks the genocide is OK but Grace Tame is not. Verily, the mind boggles. How twisted must a mind be to think Tame is not a good choice to host a program about autism in women?
Although I see nothing wrong with him or anyone "criticising the broadcaster" or giving an interview to fellow zionist Avi Yemeni, his portrayal of protestor's use of the phrase "globalise the intifada" is exactly what we'd expect from a zionist. Twist, Deflect, Disparage and Accuse is part of their MO (along with Kill, Displace and Terrorise). I agree with the others here, SACK PICKERING. Did he condemn israel when they tried their little regime change in Iran recently, effectively promoting intifada, a violent one at that with the use of mossad agents?
So what you are saying is that Charlie Pickering violated ABC policies by using his position as an ABC presenter, standing outside of the ABC in an interview. In his choice of placement he deliberately highlighted his credentials and relationship with the ABC. In so doing the interview implied that this was endorsed by the ABC. As such his actions violated policies :
Policy 4 Impartiality and diversity of perspectives. - using his "Jewish lens" to interpret a person's words and actions. In so doing failing to respect the lens and perspective of people who are of a different religion or political persuasion. Could a different interviewer say "As a Catholic Australian", I oppose interviews and voices given to pro-abortion activists?
Policy 6 Privacy. - His dealings with an organisation known not to respect privacy and safety of individuals. It would be difficult for Pickering to argue he did not know of what had happened to his colleague Faruqi in 2018.
'Jewish Australian'? I don't think I've heard that one before. It seems to mean that you live in a tiny, self-justifying bubble, which thinks the genocide is OK but Grace Tame is not. Verily, the mind boggles. How twisted must a mind be to think Tame is not a good choice to host a program about autism in women?
sack picker/ing.the hypocrisy of the abc to allow him to keep attacking with biased and misguided rhetoric of discrimination and hate.
is it because he is a "mere male"? is it because he is "expressing his freedom of speech"as a zionist.SACK PICKERING!!!!
Although I see nothing wrong with him or anyone "criticising the broadcaster" or giving an interview to fellow zionist Avi Yemeni, his portrayal of protestor's use of the phrase "globalise the intifada" is exactly what we'd expect from a zionist. Twist, Deflect, Disparage and Accuse is part of their MO (along with Kill, Displace and Terrorise). I agree with the others here, SACK PICKERING. Did he condemn israel when they tried their little regime change in Iran recently, effectively promoting intifada, a violent one at that with the use of mossad agents?
So what you are saying is that Charlie Pickering violated ABC policies by using his position as an ABC presenter, standing outside of the ABC in an interview. In his choice of placement he deliberately highlighted his credentials and relationship with the ABC. In so doing the interview implied that this was endorsed by the ABC. As such his actions violated policies :
Policy 4 Impartiality and diversity of perspectives. - using his "Jewish lens" to interpret a person's words and actions. In so doing failing to respect the lens and perspective of people who are of a different religion or political persuasion. Could a different interviewer say "As a Catholic Australian", I oppose interviews and voices given to pro-abortion activists?
Policy 6 Privacy. - His dealings with an organisation known not to respect privacy and safety of individuals. It would be difficult for Pickering to argue he did not know of what had happened to his colleague Faruqi in 2018.
Are Pickering's remarks in line with the ABC public comment policy I wonder?